You are currently viewing California Plans for a Post-Roe World as Abortion Access Shrinks Elsewhere

California Plans For A Post-Roe World As Abortion Access Shrinks Elsewhere » Hindi SciTech Hindi SciTech – SKF

With abortion rights sweeping the United States, California is preparing to become the nation’s leading abortion clinic.

Democratic Governor. Gavin Newsom and legislative leaders have invited a group made up of experts in reproductive health to come up with policies to improve the state’s abortion facilities and make it ready for more patients. Lawmakers plan to start a debate on the proposals when they meet again in January.

Clinics are preparing themselves to meet the growing demand for abortion.

Janet Jacobson, medical director of Planned Parenthood for Orange and San Bernardino counties, said at least three or four patients from the state come to their clinics on a daily basis, which is closely related to the number of patients seeking medical attention beforehand. are almost more than double that. A complete ban on abortion was implemented in the state of Texas in September.

Although nine clinics are able to take that steady stream of patients, they estimate at least 50 patients from out-of-state per week, if they are allowed to. Jacobson said the U.S. Supreme Court majority conservatives end abortion rights nationwide. Jacobson based his estimate on recent data from the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that advocates for women’s rights to abortion and reproductive health.

It is expanding the capacity of its staff and appointments and hopes to accommodate all.

“We must make sure that we are able to care for every patient in our California,” Jacobson said. “We don’t want them to be cut from appointments”.

Texas law bans nearly all abortions after six weeks of gestation. It also allowed citizens to sue private individuals who perform or “aid and facilitate” abortions after this period. On November, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case. 1 and is scheduled to issue a decision on the constitutionality of the law in June. However, Florida and Ohio plan to adopt counterfeiting laws.

The High Court will next month hear another abortion case with more consequences, Dobbs vs Jackson Women’s Health Organization,A lawsuit that challenges the legality and constitutionality of a Mississippi law that prohibits abortions within 15 weeks. If the court chooses to support Mississippi and decides to do so, it could invalidate abortion rights established by the famous Cry in v. wade Case.

If that happens, reproductive rights experts say 26 states will outlaw abortions altogether, and states that have stronger abortion safeguards, such as California, will attract more patients. Based on Guttmacher data this could result in 3000% more patients who “travel to California to receive abortion services” each year.

In 2017 which was the latest year in which data was accessible through Guttmacher, California—the nation’s most populous state—was home to more abortion providers, with 419 clinics, hospitals, or doctors’ offices performing the procedure. The next most popular state was New York, with 252, as well as Florida with 85. The next two states, Arizona Nevada and Arizona Nevada, have 11 each. Of the 862,320 abortions performed across the United States that year, about 15% occurred in California.

Planned Parenthood’s clinics in California claim they serve about 7,000 patients from out of state each year. They are expecting many new patients to come in, especially in tourist centers such as the Los Angeles area.

On September 11, groups such as Planned Parenthood and Welfare for Black Women convened the California Future of Abortion Council with the support of powerful Democratic officials, including Newsom as well as State Senate Speaker Tony Atkins and Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon. Were.

Atkins, director of the San Diego Women’s Health Clinic in the 1980s, said he spent a lot of time with women in states where abortion was difficult. She added that California is determined to ensure access to abortions throughout the state as well.

The council focused on increasing the amount of funding available for abortion, offering financial and logistical support for women who travel, as well as increasing the number of health professionals who perform abortions, and increasing legal protections for women who have abortions. will focus. ,

Expanding capacity could result in allowing more physicians to perform abortions, or investing more money in telehealth to allow patients to consult a doctor online and prescribe medication for medical abortion, an option that California The doctors of K are currently only able to introduce patients. California.

The first thing the state should do is improve the supply of healthcare providers, especially those who provide abortions in the second trimester. These are more expensive and difficult to perform than first trimester abortions. Council member Dr. Daniel Grossman, director of the Advanced New Standards in Reproductive Health Program at the University of California-San Francisco.

It is impossible to set up an abortion service across the country, Grossman said. Instead the council should focus on building “hubs that can offer abortion care to a large number of individuals”.

California is struggling to offer abortions to everyone who wants an abortion, especially low-income women who are covered by Medi-Cal, California’s Medicaid program. For example, 28 counties include 10% of MediCal beneficiaries who are pregnant who are not equipped to provide abortions for Medi-Cal recipients.

Medical abortion that uses pills used to terminate an unborn child costs California patients an average of $306 out of pocket. This is according to an assessment done by the California Health Benefits Review Program, however, it is not available after 10 weeks. After that, the only option is surgical abortion, which costs an average of $887 out of pocket in California.

The council’s suggestions include increasing the amount Medi-Cal pays for abortions so that more doctors can perform them, said council member Fabiola Carrion, interim director of sexual and reproductive health for the National Health Law Program. he said.

Medi-Cal reimburses $354.43 for second-trimester abortions. A 2020 study published in the journal Contraception showed that states paid an average of $79 per second trimester abortions in 2017, up from $626 in 2017.

Patients traveling outside California will not benefit from the increase in Medi-Cal premiums. In general, private insurance does not cover out-of-state abortions, so most women who participate in other states’ Medicaid programs must cover the cost out-of-pocket as well.

According to Brandon Richards, communications director for Planned Parenthood Associates of California, this council hopes to cut costs for residents and visitors to the state. “It’s about making it easier for people in California to get abortions, whether they live here or come from outside California,” he said.

According to council committee member Jessica Pinckney, executive director of Access Reproductive Justice, one way to reduce expenses is to provide practical support, such as childcare, transportation to hotels, time off from work, a fund that helps people with abortions. Helps to pay for ,

Pinckney said she is in talks with Los Angeles County to set up funds to cover some of the costs for anyone who wishes to have an abortion within the county. The fund will be drawn on similar utensils that are maintained by cities such as New York; Austin, Texas, as well as Portland, Oregon, could be used as a model for the first fund that is statewide, Pinckney said.

The majority of Texans seeking abortions after the state law goes into effect are moving to states such as Colorado, New Mexico and Oklahoma, according to Sierra Harris, deputy director of strategies for the National Network of Abortion Funds’ network of abortions. On the other hand, women in these states are finding it difficult to get treatment and are moving to California to make an appointment.

The need for practical out-of-state support for out-of-state patients is critical, said Alisa Perucchi, operations manager of the Women’s Choice Clinic at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, one of five clinics for abortion in California hospitals.

Dr. Peruchi’s clinic focuses on telemedicine, telephone consultations as well as other time-saving methods, so they can also add appointments for out-of-state patients if necessary.

However, more slots would be useless when women would not be able to travel to California. The clinic has scheduled about 10 for Texans since the time the state ban went into effect and only showed half of women who have relatives who live in California.

“Most people don’t have enough money to go to this place,” she said. “If it were true that the cost of getting an abortion is well-borne by most wealthy people, they would fly here.”

The story was first released on November 17, 2020, via Kaiser Health News. Find the original story here.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.